Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Regarding 'blackwater/NATO/Western' mercenary in Mariupol

Catherine A. Fitzpatrick does a great job explaining the phenomenon at  interpretermag.com [link to full article, the selected abstracts are copied here, since I haven't found the way to reblogg it here]

This clip was broadcast 
on Russia's TV1 and other channels:


At 0:41, the soldier can be seen putting his hand up in front of the camera and saying "out of my face":
Out-of-my-face.jpg
Possibly the soldier spoke in English, even though the TV journalist spoke in Russian, because he saw the English letters "MTV" which isn't music television but stands for "Mariupol TV".
This is a problem for "LifeNews," as well, which seems to have wanted to give itself more international recognition by calling itself an English name -- but which then can be perceived by locals as a foreign camera crew.
Maybe the soldier simply thought that was a great expression he had heard on TV.

But Russian propagandists have a more damning clip, which they take from the Azov Battalion video (which we reported January 24) in which a soldier is heard speaking at length to the cameraman about a Grad missile crater in a school yard:


At 0:11, we can see a soldier wearing his cap backwards, in the American style:
Cap-Backwards.jpg

This soldier's accent isn't American but it might be British or Australian although he doesn't sound like a native speaker, as he speaks in very short sentences, without proper grammar, drops articles, and has an unaspirated "k" in the word "school." Here's a transcript of the dialogue:
Azov soldier (cameraman): Is detected?
English-speaking soldier: It's it's right in.
Azov soldier: Uh-huh
English-speaking soldier: So. Maybe explode, maybe not...
Azov solider: Uh-huh
English-speaking soldier: So blow up in situ....Go to wall here.
Azov soldier: Uh-huh
English-speaking soldier: It's a kindergarten, school?
Azov soldier: Yes, yes.
So it's not confirmed that the person speaking English is in fact a foreigner -- "blow up" and "school" are two words not pronounced like a native speaker.
It seems as if both videos are covering the same man with a khaki-colored cap and a green backpack. At 0:43 in the first video:
Backpack-1.jpg
 At 0:11 in the second video:
Backpack-2.jpg
Why would both the cameraman and the other soldier speak in English at the end of this video footage of a devastated Mariupol?
One possibility is that the Azov cameraman, throughout the video, kept creating ready-made stand-alone clips that might be used in a television broadcast. Multiple times throughout the video, he stops people in the scene, asks them to introduce themselves, and asks them to repeat several times the name of the location and the city where they were, i.e. "School No. 5" and "city of Mariupol" -- even though these facts were already obvious to the cameraman.
So perhaps the cameraman was hoping to create a ready-made episode that he could give to foreign news that would prove in particular a particularly dangerous situation -- unexploded rockets in a school yard. 
To be sure, there might actually be a foreign volunteer in Azov. Azov, an ultranationalist battalion known for its symbols similar to Nazi insignia, has received enormous scrutiny from some foreign and Russian media, because it seems to embody the worst case of much-feared Ukrainian nationalism.
Azov is said to have a Swedish white supremacist named Mikael Skillt in its ranks, and other European recruits seem to have been attracted to the battalion, according to Wikipedia.
The reason the fighter in the video may not sound like a native English speaker is that he could be Swedish or French or some other nationality, and English is a lingua franca with the Ukrainian soldier.
So perhaps this one man is a foreigner fighting for the Azov Battalion, but it hasn't been proven.
Azov hasn't commented on the allegations of having foreign fighters among them, and there hasn't yet been any credible media investigating the story.
UPDATE:
The mystery of the foreign fighter in Azov Battalion has been solved, thanks to a reader:



So Garrett is British, not American, and the reason he spoke in such short, clipped sentences was that he was busy with the job he came to Ukraine to do: de-mining.
Thus, there are no "NATO legions," but just a British specialist who came to Ukraine to help. No doubt the teachers and children of Day Care Center No. 5  in Mariupol will be glad that he identified unexploded Grad rockets on the center's grounds, which we learn about from the full version of this video (11:10).
Garrett, who goes by the nickname "Swampy," has replied to those claiming he is a "NATO agent":
In response to the recent allegations of me being an american mercenary paid by western governments. I shall soon release my own statement. For now, here is my response to a certain twitter idiot
 Garrett then published a photo of himself upside down:
Swampy.jpg

Saturday, January 24, 2015

Terror act in Mariupol...

Preliminary info: 27 civilians killed, 97 wounded as result of Russian-backed terroristic assault on Ukrainian port city of Mariupol with GRAD multiple rocket launchers.

Saturday, January 17, 2015

Positional reload?

There is this gentleman, called Yevgenyy Primakov who very recently issued a series of peculiarly interesting statements about Ukraine-Russia situation.

 Long story short: ''Crimea belongs to Russia, East Ukraine aka 'Novorussia' belongs to Ukraine, let's end the bloodshed, be friends and globalize together''.

Simultaneously, USofA issue a statement that denies calling DNR/LNR as terrorist organisations, stresses the importance of de-escalation and united efforts towards combating terror threat globally. Such rhetoric was used previously by EU, who kept blabbering 'deep concerns' while people kept dying in East Ukraine. However, now EU conveys another message through its spoke-person A. Merkel: ''More sanctions, no soft approach till withdrawal of Russian troops from East Ukraine and Crimea''. What a surprise.

Nevertheless, Primakov's statement under the circumstances hints that there's been a certain series of temporal agreements (which begs the question of how long would it last, as per Minsk peace agreements it didn't take long, hah).

Some conspirologists believe that such turn of events signify the win of Rothchild's clan. It gets even more interesting, since 'ex'FSB colonel Girkin (one of the leaders of separatists, Russian by citizenship and nationality) entered specifically Sloviansk, which is in a region where Rothchild's fuel company planned to operate. I don't know how just would be to call it a 'fixed match' truce, but it is known that at least Poroshenko is tied by Rothchilds, since he chose using 'Rothchilds Inc' as an escrow to sell his candy business. Does this mean that clan representatives in Russia (oligarch Deripasca et al, and  Dmitry Medvedev) have a card-blanch for a changed of leadership?  It may explain why Deripasca won an arbitrary process regarding one of Ukraine's ports.

To sum it up, on Ukraine's chessboard there are three old men with big ambitions and few time on Earth: Y. Primakov (85 y.o); H. Kissinger (91 y.o and favored much by Putin) and G. Soros (84 y.o, who bought a lot of Ukraine's bonds and will loose if the country defaults). I wonder though, how many of the actors are interested in Ukraine's wellbeing. Let me guess, none? 

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

NYTI's recap of Yanukovich's last days

Rather interesting chronology of Yanukovich fleeing Ukraine [he's been added to wanted list in Interpol recently]. Berkut's commentaries I think I haven't read before even in UA sources. Can't vouch for what was said between diplomats, but the seqence and external appearance of the events transpired is relatively accurate. So, enjoy the link