Positional reload?

There is this gentleman, called Yevgenyy Primakov who very recently issued a series of peculiarly interesting statements about Ukraine-Russia situation.

 Long story short: ''Crimea belongs to Russia, East Ukraine aka 'Novorussia' belongs to Ukraine, let's end the bloodshed, be friends and globalize together''.

Simultaneously, USofA issue a statement that denies calling DNR/LNR as terrorist organisations, stresses the importance of de-escalation and united efforts towards combating terror threat globally. Such rhetoric was used previously by EU, who kept blabbering 'deep concerns' while people kept dying in East Ukraine. However, now EU conveys another message through its spoke-person A. Merkel: ''More sanctions, no soft approach till withdrawal of Russian troops from East Ukraine and Crimea''. What a surprise.

Nevertheless, Primakov's statement under the circumstances hints that there's been a certain series of temporal agreements (which begs the question of how long would it last, as per Minsk peace agreements it didn't take long, hah).

Some conspirologists believe that such turn of events signify the win of Rothchild's clan. It gets even more interesting, since 'ex'FSB colonel Girkin (one of the leaders of separatists, Russian by citizenship and nationality) entered specifically Sloviansk, which is in a region where Rothchild's fuel company planned to operate. I don't know how just would be to call it a 'fixed match' truce, but it is known that at least Poroshenko is tied by Rothchilds, since he chose using 'Rothchilds Inc' as an escrow to sell his candy business. Does this mean that clan representatives in Russia (oligarch Deripasca et al, and  Dmitry Medvedev) have a card-blanch for a changed of leadership?  It may explain why Deripasca won an arbitrary process regarding one of Ukraine's ports.

To sum it up, on Ukraine's chessboard there are three old men with big ambitions and few time on Earth: Y. Primakov (85 y.o); H. Kissinger (91 y.o and favored much by Putin) and G. Soros (84 y.o, who bought a lot of Ukraine's bonds and will loose if the country defaults). I wonder though, how many of the actors are interested in Ukraine's wellbeing. Let me guess, none?